SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
Originalité :
Réexamen
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gut
  2018/04  
 
  2018 Apr;67(4):654-662.  
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313428.  
 
  Acute lower GI bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes in the first nationwide audit.  
 
  Oakland K, Guy R, Uberoi R, Hogg R, Mortensen N, Murphy MF, Jairath V; UK Lower GI Bleeding Collaborative.  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28148540  
 
 

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Lower GI bleeding (LGIB) is a common reason for emergency hospital admission, although there is paucity of data on presentations, interventions and outcomes. In this nationwide UK audit, we describe patient characteristics, interventions including endoscopy, radiology and surgery as well as clinical outcomes.

DESIGN:

Multicentre audit of adults presenting with LGIB to UK hospitals over 2 months in 2015. Consecutive cases were prospectively enrolled by clinical teams and followed for 28 days.

RESULTS:

Data on 2528 cases of LGIB were provided by 143 hospitals. Most were elderly (median age 74 years) with major comorbidities, 29.4% taking antiplatelets and 15.9% anticoagulants. Shock was uncommon (58/2528, 2.3%), but 666 (26.3%) received a red cell transfusion. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was the most common investigation (21.5%) but only 2.1% received endoscopic haemostasis. Use of embolisation or surgery was rare, used in 19 (0.8%) and 6 (0.2%) cases, respectively. 48% patients underwent no inpatient investigations. The most common diagnoses were diverticular bleeding (26.4%) and benign anorectal conditions (16.7%). Median length of stay was 3 days, 13.6% patients rebled during admission and 4.4% were readmitted with bleeding within 28 days. In-hospital mortality was 85/2528 (3.4%) and was highest in established inpatients (17.8%, p<0.0001) and in patients experiencing rebleeding (7.1%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with LGIB have a high burden of comorbidity and frequent antiplatelet or anticoagulant use. Red cell transfusion was common but most patients were not shocked and required no endoscopic, radiological or surgical treatment. Nearly half were not investigated. In-hospital mortality was related to comorbidity, not severe haemorrhage.

 

 
Question posée
 
Quelles sont les caractéristiques, les modalités et résultats de la prise de prise en charge des hémorragies digestives basses (HDB) en Grande Bretagne ?
 
Question posée
 
Dans cette étude, les principales causes d’HDB étaient l’origine diverticulaire colique (26%) ou ano-périneale (17%). Seuls 52% des patients ont bénéficié d’explorations complémentaires en urgence : - endoscopies basses : 29% dont 21,5% de recto-sigmoïdoscopie - radiologique par scanner : 20,1% et artériographie 2,5% - chirurgicale : 0,4% 25% des patients ont été transfusés et seuls 18 % des patients ont présenté une récidive dans les 28 jours. Le taux de mortalité était de 3,4%.
 
Commentaires

Cette étude confirme la faible rentabilité des examens endoscopiques bas en urgence (2,1% de geste hémostatique). Ils doivent être proposés préférentiellement en cas d’hémorragie abondante ou récidivante, idéalement après préparation colique adéquate (recommandations de faibles niveaux de preuves Françaises (SFED-2010) et Nord-Américaines (ACG-2016)).

 
www.snfge.org