SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Colo-proctologie
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Frank ZERBIB
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
  2018/12  
 
  2018 Dec ;320(23):2438-2447.  
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315.  
 
  Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth.  
 
  Blomquist JL, Muñoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30561480  
 
 

Abstract

IMPORTANCE:

Pelvic floor disorders (eg, urinary incontinence), which affect approximately 25% of women in the United States, are associated with childbirth. However, little is known about the course and progression of pelvic floor disorders over time.

OBJECTIVE:

To describe the incidence of pelvic floor disorders after childbirth and identify maternal and obstetrical characteristics associated with patterns of incidence 1 to 2 decades after delivery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

Women were recruited from a community hospital for this cohort study 5 to 10 years after their first delivery and followed up annually for up to 9 years. Recruitment was based on mode of delivery; delivery groups were matched for age and years since first delivery. Of 4072 eligible women, 1528 enrolled between October 2008 and December 2013. Annual follow-up continued through April 2017.

EXPOSURES:

Participants were categorized into the following mode of delivery groups: cesarean birth (cesarean deliveries only), spontaneous vaginal birth (≥1 spontaneous vaginal delivery and no operative vaginal deliveries), or operative vaginal birth (≥1 operative vaginal delivery).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB), and anal incontinence (AI), defined using validated threshold scores from the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire, and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination. Cumulative incidences, by delivery group, were estimated using parametric methods. Hazard ratios, by exposure, were estimated using semiparametric models.

RESULTS:

Among 1528 women (778 in the cesarean birth group, 565 in the spontaneous vaginal birth group, and 185 in the operative vaginal birth group), the median age at first delivery was 30.6 years, 1092 women (72%) were multiparous at enrollment (2887 total deliveries), and the median age at enrollment was 38.3 years. During a median follow-up of 5.1 years (7804 person-visits), there were 138 cases of SUI, 117 cases of OAB, 168 cases of AI, and 153 cases of POP. For spontaneous vaginal delivery (reference), the 15-year cumulative incidences of pelvic floor disorders after first delivery were as follows: SUI, 34.3% (95% CI, 29.9%-38.6%); OAB, 21.8% (95% CI, 17.8%-25.7%); AI, 30.6% (95% CI, 26.4%-34.9%), and POP, 30.0% (95% CI, 25.1%-34.9%). Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery was associated with significantly lower hazard of SUI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.46 [95% CI, 0.32-0.67]), OAB (aHR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.34-0.76]), and POP (aHR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.19-0.42]), while operative vaginal delivery was associated with significantly higher hazard of AI (aHR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.14-2.68]) and POP (aHR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.28-2.78]). Stratifying by delivery mode, the hazard ratios for POP, relative to a genital hiatus size less than or equal to 2.5 cm, were 3.0 (95% CI, 1.7-5.3) for a genital hiatus size of 3 cm and 9.0 (95% CI, 5.5-14.8) for a genital hiatus size greater than or equal to 3.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:

Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery was associated with significantly lower hazard for stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse, while operative vaginal delivery was associated with significantly higher hazard of anal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. A larger genital hiatus was associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse independent of delivery mode.

 
Question posée
 
Quels sont les risques de troubles pelviens après césarienne et accouchement par voie basse ?
 
Question posée
 
Par rapport à l’accouchement par voie basse, la césarienne réduit le risque d’incontinence urinaire d’effort, de vessie hyperactive et de prolapsus pelvien et alors que les diverses manœuvres d’accouchement par voie basse augmentent le risque d’incontinence fécale.
 
Commentaires

Cette étude de cohorte confirme le facteur de risque que représente l’accouchement par voie basse dans le développement des troubles fonctionnels et anatomiques pelviens. Ces facteurs de risque étaient connus, mais cette étude porte sur une cohorte importante et « enfonce le clou ». Pour autant, il est difficile de proposer une césarienne à toutes les femmes, et il faut probablement identifier plus précisément les femmes qui sont exposées au plus grand risque de séquelles (par exemple, le rôle de l’épisiotomie est discuté).

 
 
www.snfge.org