SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancer colorectal (CCR)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Dr Yann TOUCHEFEU
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of clinical oncology (JCO)
  2018/03  
 
  2018 Mar;36(7):674-681.  
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2931  
 
  Bevacizumab Maintenance Versus No Maintenance During Chemotherapy-Free Intervals in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial (PRODIGE 9).  
 
  Aparicio T, Ghiringhelli F, Boige V, Le Malicot K, Taieb J, Bouché O, Phelip JM, François E, Borel C, Faroux R, Dahan L, Jacquot S, Genet D, Khemissa F, Suc E, Desseigne F, Texereau P, Lepage C, Bennouna J; PRODIGE 9 Investigators.  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346040  
 
 

Abstract

Purpose Conflicting results are reported for maintenance treatment with bevacizumab during chemotherapy-free intervals (CFI) in metastatic colorectal cancer after induction chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods In this open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial, we compared the tumor control duration (TCD) observed with bevacizumab maintenance and with no treatment (observation) during CFI subsequent to induction chemotherapy with 12 cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus bevacizumab. After disease progression, the induction regimen was repeated for eight cycles, followed by a new CFI.

Results From March 2010 to July 2013, 491 patients were randomly assigned. Disease progression or death occurred during induction chemotherapy in 85 patients (17%); 261 patients (53%) had at least one reinduction, 107 (22%) had two reinductions, and 56 (11%) had three or more reinductions. The median TCD was 15 months in both groups; the median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was 9.2 and 8.9 months in the maintenance group and observation groups, respectively. The TCD observed in both groups was higher compared with the TCD hypotheses of the trial. The median overall survival (OS) was 21.7 and 22.0 months in the maintenance and observation groups, respectively. In the per-protocol population, defined as patients with at least one reinduction after the first progression, the median duration of the first CFI was 4.3 months in both arms; the median TCD was 17.8 and 23.3 months ( P = .339), the median PFS was 9.9 and 9.5 months, and the median OS was 27.6 and 28.5 months in the maintenance and observation groups, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that female gender, WHO performance status ≥ 2, and unresected primary tumors were associated with a shorter TCD.

Conclusion Bevacizumab maintenance monotherapy did not improve TCD, CFI duration, PFS, or OS.

 

 
Question posée
 
Un traitement d’entretien par bévacizumab améliore-t-il le temps de contrôle de la maladie après un traitement d’induction de 12 cycles de FOLFIRI Bévacizumab, par rapport à une surveillance seule ?
 
Question posée
 
Non.
 
Commentaires

Il n’y a pas d’intérêt démontré du bévacizumab seul en traitement d’entretien. La référence reste le bévacizumab associé à une fluoropyrmimidine.

 
www.snfge.org