|
|
|
Thématique :
- Cancer colorectal (CCR)
|
|
|
Originalité :
Très original
|
|
|
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique : |
Pas encore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur David TOUGERON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Annals of oncology
|
 |
|
2016/06
|
|
|
|
2016 Jun;27(6):1055-61
|
|
|
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw136
|
|
|
|
Cetuximab continuation after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAPRI-GOIM): a randomized phase II trial of FOLFOX plus cetuximab versus FOLFOX
|
|
|
|
Ciardiello F, Normanno N, Martinelli E, Troiani T, Pisconti S, Cardone C, Nappi A, Bordonaro AR, Rachiglio M, Lambiase M, Latiano TP, Modoni G, Cordio S, Giuliani F, Biglietto M, Montesarchio V, Barone C, Tonini G, Cinieri S, Febbraro A, Rizzi D, De Vita F, Orditura M, Colucci G, Maiello E
|
|
|
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002107
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND:
Cetuximab plus chemotherapy is a first-line treatment option in metastatic KRAS and NRAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. No data are currently available on continuing anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy beyond progression.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
We did this open-label, 1:1 randomized phase II trial at 25 hospitals in Italy to evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) as second-line treatment of KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic CRC patients treated in first line with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab. Patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFOX (arm B). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Tumour tissues were assessed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). This report is the final analysis.
RESULTS:
Between 1 February 2010 and 28 September 2014, 153 patients were randomized (74 in arm A and 79 in arm B). Median PFS was 6.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.7-8.0] versus 4.5 months (95% CI 3.3-5.7); [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% CI 0.58-1.12; P = 0.19], respectively. NGS was performed in 117/153 (76.5%) cases; 66/117 patients (34 in arm A and 32 in arm B) had KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA wild-type tumours. For these patients, PFS was longer in the FOLFOX plus cetuximab arm [median 6.9 (95% CI 5.5-8.2) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.7-6.9); HR, 0.56 (95% CI 0.33-0.94); P = 0.025]. There was a trend in better overall survival: median 23.7 [(95% CI 19.4-28.0) versus 19.8 months (95% CI 14.9-24.7); HR, 0.57 (95% CI 0.32-1.02); P = 0.056].
CONCLUSIONS:
Continuing cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy is of potential therapeutic efficacy in molecularly selected patients and should be validated in randomized phase III trials.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
|
|
|
|
|
Dans les cancers colorectaux métastatiques, l’intérêt de poursuivre un anti-angiogénique en 2ème ligne après progression sous chimiothérapie plus anti-angiogénique a été démontré dans l’étude TML. Il n’y a pas de données concernant la même stratégie avec les anti-EGFR. Cette étude randomisée de phase II compare le Folfox au Folfox plus cétuximab après progression sous Folfiri plus cétuximab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dans le sous-groupe des tumeurs complétement sauvages (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF et PIK3CA) la poursuite du cétuximab est associée à une augmentation de la survie sans progression (6,9 mois versus 5,3 mois, p=0,025) et une tendance pour la survie globale (23,7 mois versus 19,8 mois, p=0,056).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ces résultats doivent être validés en phase III. De plus, une randomisation anti-angiogénique versus anti-EGFR en 2ème ligne après progression sous anti-EGFR serait souhaitable.
|
|
|