SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Foie
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Jean-Louis PAYEN
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of Hepatology
  2018/06  
 
  2018 Jun;68(6):1181-1190.  
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.033.  
 
  Characterization of liver injury induced by cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors  
 
  De Martin E, Michot JM, Papouin B, Champiat S, Mateus C, Lambotte O, Roche B, Antonini TM, Coilly A, Laghouati S, Robert C, Marabelle A, Guettier C, Samuel D  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29427729  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Immunotherapy for metastatic cancer can be complicated by the onset of hepatic immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). This study compared hepatic IRAEs associated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS:

Among 536 patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 immunotherapies, 19 (3.5%) were referred to the liver unit for grade ≥3 hepatitis. Of these patients, nine had received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and seven had received anti-CTLA-4 mAbs, in monotherapy or in combination with anti-PD-1. Liver investigations were undertaken in these 16 patients, including viral assays, autoimmune tests and liver biopsy, histological review, and immunostaining of liver specimens.

RESULTS:

In the 16 patients included in this study, median age was 63 (range 33-84) years, and nine (56%) were female. Time between therapy initiation and hepatitis was five (range, 1-49) weeks and median number of immunotherapy injections was two (range, 1-36). No patients developed hepatic failure. Histology related to anti-CTLA-4 mAbs demonstrated granulomatous hepatitis including fibrin ring granulomas and central vein endotheliitis. Histology related to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs was characterised by lobular hepatitis. The management of hepatic IRAEs was tailored according to the severity of both the biology and histology of liver injury: six patients improved spontaneously; seven received oral corticosteroids at 0.5-1 mg/kg/day; two were maintained on 0.2 mg/kg/day corticosteroids; and one patient required pulses and 2.5 mg/kg/day of corticosteroids, and the addition of a second immunosuppressive drug. In three patients, immunotherapy was reintroduced without recurrence of liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Acute hepatitis resulting from immunotherapy for metastatic cancer is rare (3.5%) and, in most cases, not severe. Histological assessment can distinguish between anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 mAb toxicity. The severity of liver injury is helpful for tailoring patient management, which does not require systematic corticosteroid administration.

LAY SUMMARY:

Immunotherapy for metastatic cancer can be complicated by immune-related adverse events in the liver. In patients receiving immunotherapy for metastatic cancer who develop immune-mediated hepatitis, liver biopsy is helpful for the diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of liver injury. This study demonstrates the need for patient-oriented management, which could eventually avoid unnecessary systemic corticosteroid treatment.

 

 
Question posée
 
Caractérisation de la lésion hépatique induite par l'immunothérapie du cancer en utilisant des inhibiteurs de point de contrôle immunitaire.
 
Question posée
 
L'immunothérapie pour cancer métastatique peut se compliquer d’événements indésirables liés à l’activation du système immunitaire hépatique. Chez les patients recevant une immunothérapie pour un cancer métastatique qui développent une hépatite à médiation immunitaire, une biopsie hépatique est utile pour le diagnostic et l'évaluation de la gravité des lésions hépatiques, elle permet de bien caractériser le type de lésion et ainsi d’éviter certains traitements corticostéroïdes.
 
Commentaires

Pas de commentaire.

 
www.snfge.org