SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- MICI
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Stéphane NAHON
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  2016/08  
 
  2016 Aug;14(8):1120-1129.e6  
  doi : 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.038  
 
  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Biologic-Naive Patients With Crohn's Disease  
 
  Singh S, Heien HC, Sangaralingham LR, Schilz SR, Kappelman MD, Shah ND, Loftus EV Jr  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27058635  
 
 

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF agents) are the most effective therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). We evaluated the real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of different anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol) in biologic-naive patients with CD in a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study using a national administrative claims database (Optum Labs Data Warehouse).

METHODS:

We identified 3205 biologic-naive patients with CD (mean age, 41 ± 15 years; 45% male; median follow-up period after anti-TNF therapy, 19 months; 44.5% on infliximab and 38.9% on adalimumab) who received their first prescription for an anti-TNF agent (infliximab, adalimumab, or certolizumab pegol) after a 12-month period without any anti-TNF treatment (baseline), and with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months after their initial anti-TNF prescription, between 2006 and 2014. The primary outcomes were all-cause and CD-related hospitalization, abdominal surgery, corticosteroid use, and serious infections. We performed a propensity-matched, Cox proportional hazards analysis, accounting for baseline demographics, health care use, comorbidities, and use of CD-related medication.

RESULTS:

Compared with adalimumab-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had a lower risk of CD-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.98), abdominal surgery (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99), and corticosteroid use (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96). Compared with certolizumab pegol-treated patients, infliximab-treated patients had a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95) and CD-related hospitalization (aHR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.90). Adalimumab-treated patients had outcomes comparable with those of certolizumab pegol-treated patients. All agents had comparable risk of serious infections.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a retrospective analysis of a large cohort of biologic-naive patients with CD, we found infliximab to be superior to adalimumab and certolizumab pegol for patient-relevant outcomes, without increased risk of serious infections.

 
Question posée
 
Les anti-TNF ont-ils tous la même efficacité et le même profil de tolérance au cours de la maladie de Crohn ?
 
Question posée
 
Dans cette cohorte rétrospective de patients naifs d’anti-TNF, l’administration d’infliximab était associée à un risque plus faible d’hospitalisation liée à la MICI, de chirurgie et d’utilisation de corticoïdes comparée à l’adalimumab.
 
Commentaires

Il s’agit d’un des premiers travaux comparant l’efficacité des anti-TNF au cours de la maladie de Crohn et montrant la supériorité de l’infliximab sur l’adalimumab et le certolizumab. Toutefois il s’agit d’un travail rétrospectif avec potentiellement des biais méthodologiques. Des études prospectives comparatives apparaissent nécessaires lors du développement d’une nouvelle molécule.

 
www.snfge.org