SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Edouard Chabrun
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gut
  2016/07  
 
  2016 Jul 27. pii: gutjnl-2015-309848  
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848  
 
  Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors  
 
  Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ  
  http://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2016/07/27/gutjnl-2015-309848.abstract?sid=3694baa7-a36a-4978-860f-97c75b7e48f0  
 
 

Objectives
Perforation is the most serious complication associated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). We propose a new classification for the appearance and integrity of the muscularis propria (MP) after EMR including various extents of deep mural injury (DMI). Risk factors for these injuries were analysed.

Design
Endoscopic images and histological specimens of consecutive patients undergoing EMR of colonic laterally spreading lesions ≥20 mm at a large Australian tertiary referral endoscopy unit were retrospectively analysed using our new DMI classification system. DMI was graded according to MP injury (I/II intact MP without/with fibrosis, III target sign, IV/V obvious transmural perforation without/with contamination). Histological specimens were examined for included MP and patient outcomes were recorded. All type III–V DMI signs were clipped if possible, types I and II DMI were clipped at the endoscopists’ discretion.

Results
EMR was performed in 911 lesions (mean size 37 mm) in 802 patients (male sex 51.4%, mean age 67 years). DMI signs were identified in 83 patients (10.3%). Type III–V DMI was identified in 24 patients (3.0%); clipping was successfully performed in all patients. A clinically significant perforation occurred in two patients (0.2%). Only one of the 59 type I/II cases experienced a delayed perforation. 85.5% of patients with DMI were discharged on the same day, all without sequelae. On multivariable analysis, type III–V DMI was associated with transverse colon location (OR 3.55, p=0.028), en bloc resection (OR 3.84, p=0.005) and high-grade dysplasia or submucosal invasive cancer (OR 2.97, p 0.014).

Conclusions
In this retrospective analysis, use of the new classification and management with clips appeared to be a safe approach. Advanced DMI types (III–V) occurred in 3.0% of patients and were associated with identifiable risk factors. Further prospective clinical studies should use this new classification.

 
Question posée
 
Intérêt d’une classification des perforations après mucosectomie de polypes coliques ≥ 20mm (en fonction de l’aspect et de l’intégrité de la muscularis propria (MP), de DMI (deep mural injury) I à V).
 
Question posée
 
Analyse rétrospective de 911 lésions réséquées chez 802 patients. 3% des patients ont présenté une perforation sévère (comportant au moins le signe de la cible (III) et au maximum une perforation trans-murale avec bactériémie (V)). Ces perforations ont toutes été refermées endoscopiquement avec des clips. Les facteurs de risques des perforations DMI III à V, en analyse multivariée, étaient la localisation colique droite du polype, le caractère monobloc de la résection et l’histologie (adénome en dysplasie de haut grade ou adénocarcinome envahissant la sous-muqueuse).
 
Commentaires

Cette étude a pour principal intérêt de montrer le faible taux de perforation post mucosectomie de lésion étendue du côlon. L’apport d’une classification des perforations est pour l’instant incertain. En effet, cela changerait il la suite de la prise en charge ? A la manière de La Palice, nous aurons tendance à dire que toute suspicion de perforation doit être refermée par clips.

 
www.snfge.org