SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
Originalité :
Réexamen
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Patrice PIENKOWSKI
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Endoscopy
  2016/05  
 
  2016 May 11  
  -  
 
  Developing a score chart to improve risk stratification of patients with colorectal adenoma.  
 
  van Heijningen EB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Hees F, Kuipers EJ, Biermann K, de Koning HJ, van Ballegooijen M, Steyerberg EW; SAP Study Group.  
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Developing+a+score+chart+to+improve+risk+stratification+of+patients+with+colorectal+adenoma.  
 
 

Background and study aims: Current surveillance guidelines risk stratify patients with adenoma by using only one or two factors: adenoma multiplicity or presence of an advanced adenoma characteristic. Combinations of adenoma characteristics are not considered, which limits the predictive value of these guidelines. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system for more refined risk stratification of patients with adenoma. Patients and methods: The Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) was used to identify newly diagnosed patients with adenoma in 10 Dutch hospitals between 1988 and 2002. Medical records were reviewed until 1 December 2008 for follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess patient- and adenoma-related predictors of metachronous advanced neoplasia. The prediction model was validated by bootstrapping and cross-validation. A score chart was developed based on identified adenoma-related predictors. The discriminative ability of the prediction model was compared with currently used risk stratifications in surveillance guidelines. Results: A total of 2914 patients with adenoma were included (mean age 61 years; 55 % male). The score chart consisted of characteristics that contributed 1 point (size ≥ 10 mm, villous histology, proximal location, having 2 - 4 adenomas) or 2 points (having ≥ 5 adenomas). A patient's adenoma risk score could range from 0 to 5 points. A score of 5 for a 75-year-old man implied a 5-year risk of advanced neoplasia of 46 %. The discriminative ability of the model was moderate (c-statistic 0.712) but better than risk stratifications in current international guidelines, which had c-statistics of 0.642 - 0.674. Conclusion: A score chart that combines adenoma-related predictors of advanced colorectal neoplasia optimized the risk stratification of patients with adenoma for appropriate surveillance colonoscopy intervals.

 
Question posée
 
Comment optimiser la valeur prédictive des critères de surveillance post-polypectomie liés aux caractéristiques des adénomes ?
 
Question posée
 
Etude multicentrique hollandaise menées entre 1988 et 2002 dans le cadre du registre national portant sur près de 3000 patients. Un score de 1 à 5 est calculé de la manière suivante : 1 point pour la taille, la composante villeuse et la localisation proximale, 2 points si > 5 adénomes. L’apport de ce score prédictif est jugé modeste par rapport aux critères usuels.
 
Commentaires

Un ajustement à la marge des critères prédictifs liés aux lésions ; l’association de critères environnementaux (obésité, diabète …) n’a pas été testée. Rappelons que les recommandations HAS 2013 ont abandonné la composante villeuse.

 
www.snfge.org