SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Colo-proctologie
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Pauline JOUET
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gastroenterology
  2018/04  
 
  2018 Apr;154(5):1298-1308.e7.  
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.021.  
 
  Efficacy of Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication vs Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication or Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.  
 
  Richter JE, Kumar A, Lipka S, Miladinovic B, Velanovich V  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29305934  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

The effects of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) have been compared with those of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or a sham procedure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but there has been no direct comparison of TIF vs LNF. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the relative efficacies of TIF vs LNF in patients with GERD.

METHODS:

We searched publication databases and conference abstracts through May 10, 2017 for randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of TIF or LNF with that of a sham procedure or PPIs in patients with GERD. We performed a network meta-analysis using Bayesian methods under random-effects multiple treatment comparisons. We assessed ranking probability by surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

RESULTS:

Our search identified 7 trials comprising 1128 patients. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranking indicated TIF had highest probability of increasing patients' health-related quality of life (0.96), followed by LNF (0.66), a sham procedure (0.35), and PPIs (0.042). LNF had the highest probability of increasing percent time at pH <4 (0.99), followed by PPIs (0.64), TIF (0.32), and the sham procedure (0.05). LNF also had the highest probability of increasing LES pressure (0.78), followed by TIF (0.72) and PPIs (0.01). Patients who underwent the sham procedure had the highest probability for persistent esophagitis (0.74), followed by those receiving TIF (0.69), LNF (0.38), and PPIs (0.19). Meta-regression showed a shorter follow-up time as a significant confounder for the outcome of health-related quality of life in studies of TIF.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a systematic review and network meta-analysis of trials of patients with GERD, we found LNF to have the greatest ability to improve physiologic parameters of GERD, including increased LES pressure and decreased percent time pH <4. Although TIF produced the largest increase in health-related quality of life, this could be due to the shorter follow-up time of patients treated with TIF vs LNF or PPIs. TIF is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure, yet based on evaluation of benefits vs risks, we do not recommend it as a long-term alternative to PPI or LNF treatment of GERD.

 

 
Question posée
 
Quelle est l’efficacité du traitement du RGO par Fundoplicature Transorale sans incision (FT) en comparaison à la Fundoplicature de type Nissen sous Cœlioscopie (FNC), ou les Inhibiteurs de la Pompe à Protons (IPP) ?
 
Question posée
 
Dans cette revue systématique avec méta-analyse en réseau (7 essais ; 1128 patients), la procédure améliorant le plus les paramètres pH-métriques et manométriques était la FNC. La FT avait la plus grande probabilité d’améliorer les symptômes basés sur la qualité de vie, mais ceci peut être dû à un suivi plus court. Elle est associée à des complications sévères comme la perforation oesophagienne.
 
Commentaires

Cette revue nous confirme que le traitement endoscopique du RGO par Fundoplicature Transorale sans incision ne peut actuellement être recommandé comme un traitement alternatif à la chirurgie classique ou aux IPP.

 
www.snfge.org