SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Edouard Chabrun
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Endoscopy
  2017/04  
 
  2017 Apr  
  doi: 10.1055/s-0043-105484  
 
  Endoscopic resection of large duodenal and papillary lateral spreading lesions is clinically and economically advantageous compared with surgery  
 
  Klein A, Ahlenstiel G, Tate DJ, Burgess N, Richardson A, Pang T, Byth K, Bourke MJ  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28376545  
 
 

Abstract

Background and study aims Adenomas of the duodenum and ampulla are uncommon. For lesions ≤ 20 mm in size and confined to the papillary mound, endoscopic resection is well supported by systematic study. However, for large laterally spreading lesions of the duodenum or papilla (LSL-D/P), surgery is often performed despite substantial associated morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare actual endoscopic outcomes of such lesions and costs with those predicted for surgery using validated prediction tools. 

Patients and methods Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of LSL-D/P were analyzed. Two surgeons assigned the hypothetical surgical management. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and the Portsmouth Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM)) were used to predict morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Actual endoscopic and hypothetical surgical outcomes and costs were compared. 

Results A total of 102 lesions were evaluated (mean age of patients 69 years, 52 % male, mean lesion size 40 mm). Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 93.1 % at the index procedure. Endoscopic adverse events occurred in 18.6 %. Recurrence at first surveillance endoscopy was seen in 17.7 %. For patients with ≥ 2 surveillance endoscopies (n = 55), 90 % were clear of disease and considered cured (median follow-up 27 months). Compared with hypothetical surgical resection, endoscopic resection had less morbidity (18 % vs. 31 %; P  = 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (median 1 vs. 4.75 days; P < 0.001), and was less costly than surgery (mean $ 11 093 vs. $ 19 358; P < 0.001). 

Conclusion In experienced centers, even extensive LSL-D/P can be managed endoscopically with favorable morbidity and mortality profiles, and reduced costs, compared with surgery.

 
Question posée
 
Etude clinique et économique de la résection endoscopique de large lésion duodénale impliquant la papille comparée à une prise en charge chirurgicale.
 
Question posée
 
Etude rétrospective de données recueillies prospectivement et comparées à un risque et un coût théorique calculés par 2 chirurgiens experts. Cette étude est menée par le centre expert australien du Pr Bourke. 102 lésions ont été évaluées, d’une taille moyenne de 40mm, impliquant la papille pour 33% d’entre elles. La résection endoscopique était moins morbide (18% versus 31%, p=0.001), associée à une durée de séjour moins longue (1 versus 4.75, p<0.001) et un cout moins important (11093 dollars versus 19358, p<0.001) que la résection chirurgicale.
 
Commentaires

Cette étude nous montre la faisabilité d’une résection dite complexe. Mais, celle-ci dans des mains particulièrement expertes (celles de l’équipe du Pr Bourke, défenseur de la mucosectomie endoscopique) est tout de même grévée de 18% de complication, ce qui est un taux très élevé pour l’endoscopie.

 
www.snfge.org