|
|
|
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
|
|
|
Originalité :
Très original
|
|
|
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique : |
Pas encore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nom du veilleur :
Dr Yann TOUCHEFEU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Journal of clinical oncology (JCO)
|
 |
|
2019/03
|
|
|
|
2019 Mar 10;37(8):658-667.
|
|
|
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00050.
|
|
|
|
Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy or Surveillance in Resected Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): A Randomized Phase III Study.
|
|
|
|
Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, Watelet J, Hammel P, Joly JP, Boudjema K, Fartoux L, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Jouve JL, Faroux R, Guerin-Meyer V, Kurtz JE, Assénat E, Seitz JF, Baumgaertner I, Tougeron D, de la Fouchardière C, Lombard-Bohas C, Boucher E, Stanbury T, Louvet C, Malka D, Phelip JM
|
|
|
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30707660
|
|
|
|
Abstract
PURPOSE:
No standard adjuvant treatment currently is recommended in localized biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgical resection. We aimed to assess whether gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy (GEMOX) would increase relapse-free survival (RFS) while maintaining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who undergo resection.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial in 33 centers. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) within 3 months after R0 or R1 resection of a localized BTC to receive either GEMOX (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 infused on day 2 of a 2-week cycle) for 12 cycles (experimental arm A) or surveillance (standard arm B). Primary end points were RFS and HRQOL.
RESULTS:
Between July 2009 and February 2014, 196 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. After a median follow-up of 46.5 months (95% CI, 42.6 to 49.3 months), 126 RFS events and 82 deaths were recorded. There was no significant difference in RFS between the two arms (median, 30.4 months in arm A v 18.5 months in arm B; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.25; P = .48). There was no difference in time to definitive deterioration of global HRQOL (median, 31.8 months in arm A v 32.1 months in arm B; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.26; log-rank P = .39). Overall survival was not different (median, 75.8 months in arm A v 50.8 months in arm B; HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.66; log-rank P = .74). Maximal adverse events were grade 3 in 62% (arm A) versus 18% (arm B) and grade 4 in 11% versus 3% ( P < .001).
CONCLUSION:
There was no benefit of adjuvant GEMOX in resected BTC despite adequate tolerance and delivery of the regimen.
|
|
|
|
|
En cas de cancer biliaire opéré, une chimiothérapie adjuvante par GEMOX améliore-t-elle la survie sans récidive, comparée à une surveillance seule ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non. Il n’y avait pas non plus de différence de temps à détérioration de la qualité de vie (autre objectif principal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cette étude bien menée est négative. L’étude BILCAP publiée dans le Lancet en mars 2019 est critiquable, mais de ces deux essais PRODIGE-12 et BILCAP, c’est la capécitabine qui ressort comme traitement adjuvant de référence.
|
|
|