SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Dr Yann TOUCHEFEU
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of clinical oncology (JCO)
  2019/03  
 
  2019 Mar 10;37(8):658-667.  
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00050.  
 
  Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy or Surveillance in Resected Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): A Randomized Phase III Study.  
 
  Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, Watelet J, Hammel P, Joly JP, Boudjema K, Fartoux L, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Jouve JL, Faroux R, Guerin-Meyer V, Kurtz JE, Assénat E, Seitz JF, Baumgaertner I, Tougeron D, de la Fouchardière C, Lombard-Bohas C, Boucher E, Stanbury T, Louvet C, Malka D, Phelip JM  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30707660  
 
 

Abstract

PURPOSE:

No standard adjuvant treatment currently is recommended in localized biliary tract cancer (BTC) after surgical resection. We aimed to assess whether gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy (GEMOX) would increase relapse-free survival (RFS) while maintaining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who undergo resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

We performed a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial in 33 centers. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) within 3 months after R0 or R1 resection of a localized BTC to receive either GEMOX (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 infused on day 2 of a 2-week cycle) for 12 cycles (experimental arm A) or surveillance (standard arm B). Primary end points were RFS and HRQOL.

RESULTS:

Between July 2009 and February 2014, 196 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms. After a median follow-up of 46.5 months (95% CI, 42.6 to 49.3 months), 126 RFS events and 82 deaths were recorded. There was no significant difference in RFS between the two arms (median, 30.4 months in arm A v 18.5 months in arm B; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.25; P = .48). There was no difference in time to definitive deterioration of global HRQOL (median, 31.8 months in arm A v 32.1 months in arm B; HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.73 to 2.26; log-rank P = .39). Overall survival was not different (median, 75.8 months in arm A v 50.8 months in arm B; HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.66; log-rank P = .74). Maximal adverse events were grade 3 in 62% (arm A) versus 18% (arm B) and grade 4 in 11% versus 3% ( P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

There was no benefit of adjuvant GEMOX in resected BTC despite adequate tolerance and delivery of the regimen.

 
 
Question posée
 
En cas de cancer biliaire opéré, une chimiothérapie adjuvante par GEMOX améliore-t-elle la survie sans récidive, comparée à une surveillance seule ?
 
Question posée
 
Non. Il n’y avait pas non plus de différence de temps à détérioration de la qualité de vie (autre objectif principal).
 
Commentaires

Cette étude bien menée est négative. L’étude BILCAP publiée dans le Lancet en mars 2019 est critiquable, mais de ces deux essais PRODIGE-12 et BILCAP, c’est la capécitabine qui ressort comme traitement adjuvant de référence.

 
www.snfge.org