SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- MICI
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Stéphane NAHON
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gastroenterology
  2016/06  
 
  2016 Jun;150(7):1568-78  
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.072  
 
  Infliximab Reduces Endoscopic, but Not Clinical, Recurrence of Crohn's Disease After Ileocolonic Resection.  
 
  Regueiro M, Feagan BG, Zou B, Johanns J, Blank MA, Chevrier M, Plevy S, Popp J, Cornillie FJ, Lukas M, Danese S, Gionchetti P, Hanauer SB, Reinisch W, Sandborn WJ, Sorrentino D, Rutgeerts P; PREVENT Study Group.  
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26946343  
 
 

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Most patients with Crohn's disease (CD) eventually require an intestinal resection. However, CD frequently recurs after resection. We performed a randomized trial to compare the ability of infliximab vs placebo to prevent CD recurrence.

METHODS:

We evaluated the efficacy of infliximab in preventing postoperative recurrence of CD in 297 patients at 104 sites worldwide from November 2010 through May 2012. All study patients had undergone ileocolonic resection within 45 days before randomization. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given infliximab (5 mg/kg) or placebo every 8 weeks for 200 weeks. The primary end point was clinical recurrence, defined as a composite outcome consisting of a CD Activity Index score >200 and a ≥70-point increase from baseline, and endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2, determined by a central reader) or development of a new or re-draining fistula or abscess, before or at week 76. Endoscopic recurrence was a major secondary end point.

RESULTS:

A smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had a clinical recurrence before or at week 76 compared with the placebo group, but this difference was not statistically significant (12.9% vs 20.0%; absolute risk reduction [ARR] with infliximab, 7.1%; 95% confidence interval: -1.3% to 15.5%; P = .097). A significantly smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had endoscopic recurrence compared with the placebo group (30.6% vs 60.0%; ARR with infliximab, 29.4%; 95% confidence interval: 18.6% to 40.2%; P < .001). Additionally, a significantly smaller proportion of patients in the infliximab group had endoscopic recurrence based only on Rutgeerts scores ≥i2 (22.4% vs 51.3%; ARR with infliximab, 28.9%; 95% confidence interval: 18.4% to 39.4%; P < .001). Patients previously treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents or those with more than 1 resection were at greater risk for clinical recurrence. The safety profile of infliximab was similar to that from previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS:

Infliximab is not superior to placebo in preventing clinical recurrence after CD-related resection. However, infliximab does reduce endoscopic recurrence. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01190839.

 
Question posée
 
L’IFX permet-il de prévenir la récidive clinique et endoscopique après chirurgie iléo-caecale ?
 
Question posée
 
Dans ce travail prospectif, l’IFX permettait de prévenir une récidive endoscopique mais pas une récidive clinique.
 
Commentaires

En se basant sur le critère principal (récidive clinique définie par un score composite) cette étude est négative. En revanche, un score de Rutgeerts ≥i2  (critère secondaire) était plus fréquemment observé dans le groupe des patients traités par le placebo. Le score de Rutgeerts est probablement plus adapté pour apprécier l’efficacité d’un traitement après chirurgie, les scores cliniques étant souvent pris en défaut après chirurgie.

 
www.snfge.org