SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancer colorectal (CCR)
Originalité :
Réexamen
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur David TOUGERON
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Annals of oncology
  2017/03  
 
  2017 Mar 1;28(3):562-568  
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw645.  
 
  Investigating the poor outcomes of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer: Analysis from 2530 patients in randomised clinical trials.  
 
  Seligmann JF, Fisher D, Smith CG, Richman SD, Elliott F, Brown S, Adams R, Maughan T, Quirke P, Cheadle J, Seymour M, Middleton G  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27993800  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To improve strategies for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) patients, we examined individual data from patients treated with chemotherapy alone in three randomised trials to identify points on the treatment pathway where outcomes differ from BRAF wild-types.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

2530 aCRC patients were assessed from three randomised trials. End-points were progression-free survival, response rate, disease control rate, post-progression survival (P-PS) and overall survival. Treatments included first-line oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (OxFU) and second-line irinotecan. Clinicians were unaware of BRAF-status.

RESULTS:

231 patients (9.1%) had BRAF-mutant tumours. BRAF-mutation conferred significantly worse survival independent of associated clinicopathological factors known to be prognostic. Compared with wild-type, BRAF-mutant patients treated with first-line OxFU had similar DCR (59.2% versus 72%; adjusted OR = 0.76, P = 0.24) and PFS (5.7 versus 6.3 months; adjusted HR = 1.14, P = 0.26). Following progression on first-line chemotherapy, BRAF-mutant patients had a markedly shorter P-PS (4.2 versus 9.2 months, adjusted HR = 1.69, P < 0.001). Fewer BRAF-mutant patients received second-line treatment (33% versus 51%, P < 0.001), but BRAF-mutation was not associated with inferior second-line outcomes (RR adjusted OR = 0.56, P = 0.45; PFS adjusted HR = 1.01, P = 0.93). Significant clinical heterogeneity within the BRAF-mutant population was observed: a proportion (24.3%) had good first-line PFS and P-PS (both >6 months; OS = 24.0 months); however, 36.5% progressed rapidly through first-line chemotherapy and thereafter, with OS = 4.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

BRAF-mutant aCRC confers a markedly worse prognosis independent of associated clinicopathological features. Chemotherapy provides meaningful improvements in outcome throughout treatment lines. Post-progression survival is markedly worse and vigilance is required to ensure appropriate delivery of treatment after first-line progression.

 

 
Question posée
 
Les cancers colorectaux métastatiques (CCRm) BRAF muté sont de mauvais pronostics et chimio-résistants justifiant un traitement agressif par FOFIRINOX-bévacizumab si le patient est apte à le recevoir. Cette méta-analyse combine les CCRm BRAF muté de plusieurs études afin d’analyser la chimio-sensibilité à différentes chimiothérapies.
 
Question posée
 
Les CCRm BRAF muté ne semblent pas être plus sensible à une chimiothérapie particulière. Le mauvais pronostic semble plutôt lié au faible nombre de patients pouvant recevoir une 2ème ligne.
 
Commentaires

Cette analyse confirme le mauvais pronostic des CCRm BRAF muté de manière « globale » sans de chimio-résistance particulière à une molécule. Le peu de patients pouvant recevoir une 2ème justifie un traitement d’emblée agressif et des évaluations tumorales précoces (à 4 cures) afin de changer rapidement le traitement avant la détérioration de l’état général du patient qui ne sera alors plus apte à recevoir un traitement de 2ème ligne.

 
www.snfge.org