SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Foie
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Dominique VALLA
Coup de coeur :
 
 
The Lancet
  2018/03  
 
  2018 Mar;391(10126):1163-1173.  
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1.  
 
  Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial.  
 
  Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, Baron A, Park JW, Han G, Jassem J, Blanc JF, Vogel A, Komov D, Evans TRJ, Lopez C, Dutcus C, Guo M, Saito K, Kraljevic S, Tamai T, Ren M, Cheng AL  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433850  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In a phase 2 trial, lenvatinib, an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients treated with lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS:

This was an open-label, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial that recruited patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, who had not received treatment for advanced disease, at 154 sites in 20 countries throughout the Asia-Pacific, European, and North American regions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system-with region; macroscopic portal vein invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; and bodyweight as stratification factors-to receive oral lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg) or sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause. The efficacy analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, and only patients who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. The non-inferiority margin was set at 1·08. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number <a href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01761266" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov" >NCT01761266</a>.

FINDINGS:

Between March 1, 2013 and July 30, 2015, 1492 patients were recruited. 954 eligible patients were randomly assigned to lenvatinib (n=478) or sorafenib (n=476). Median survival time for lenvatinib of 13·6 months (95% CI 12·1-14·9) was non-inferior to sorafenib (12·3 months, 10·4-13·9; hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·06), meeting criteria for non-inferiority. The most common any-grade adverse events were hypertension (201 [42%]), diarrhoea (184 [39%]), decreased appetite (162 [34%]), and decreased weight (147 [31%]) for lenvatinib, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (249 [52%]), diarrhoea (220 [46%]), hypertension (144 [30%]), and decreased appetite (127 [27%]) for sorafenib.

INTERPRETATION:

Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The safety and tolerability profiles of lenvatinib were consistent with those previously observed.

 

 
Question posée
 
Le lenvatinib peut-il faire aussi bien que le sorafenib ?
 
Question posée
 
Oui, le lenvatininb fait aussi bien pour la survie globale et la survie sans récidive. Pour les effets secondaires : le lenvatinib fait mieux pour les lésions cutanées, moins bien pour l’hypertension.
 
Commentaires

Le prix devrait jouer un rôle dans le choix de la première ligne entre lenvatinib et sorafenib. L’utilisation du lenvatininb pourrait également être envisagée avant de recourir au régorafenib chez les sujets ne tolérant pas le sorafénib en raison d’effet cutanés non contrôlés par l’ajustement des doses.

 
www.snfge.org