|
|
|
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
|
|
|
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique : |
Immédiatement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur David TOUGERON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Annals of oncology
|
 |
|
2017/09
|
|
|
|
2017 Sep 1;28(9):2128-2134.
|
|
|
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx322.
|
|
|
|
Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study.
|
|
|
|
Goey KKH, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Laclé MM, Willems SM, Offerhaus GJA, de Leng WWJ, Strengman E, Ten Tije AJ, Creemers GM, van der Velden A, de Jongh FE, Erdkamp FLG, Tanis BC, Punt CJA, Koopman M
|
|
|
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28911067
|
|
|
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The phase 3 CAIRO3 study showed that capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment after six cycles capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is effective, without compromising quality of life. In this post hoc analysis with updated follow-up and data regarding sidedness, we defined subgroups according to RAS/BRAF mutation status and mismatch repair (MMR) status, and investigated their influence on treatment efficacy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
A total of 558 patients with previously untreated mCRC and stable disease or better after six cycles CAPOX-B induction treatment were randomised to either CAP-B maintenance treatment (n = 279) or observation (n = 279). Upon first progression, patients were to receive CAPOX-B reintroduction until second progression (PFS2, primary end point). We centrally assessed RAS/BRAF mutation status and MMR status, or used local results if central assessment was not possible. Intention-to-treat stratified Cox models adjusted for baseline covariables were used to examine whether treatment efficacy was modified by RAS/BRAF mutation status.
RESULTS:
RAS, BRAF mutations, and MMR deficiency were detected in 240/420 (58%), 36/381 (9%), and 4/279 (1%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 87 months (IQR 69-97), all mutational subgroups showed significant improvement from maintenance treatment for the primary end point PFS2 [RAS/BRAF wild-type: hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.84); RAS-mutant: HR 0.74 (0.55-0.98); V600EBRAF-mutant: HR 0.28 (0.12-0.64)] and secondary end points, except for the RAS-mutant subgroup regarding overall survival. Adjustment for sidedness instead of primary tumour location yielded comparable results. Although right-sided tumours were associated with inferior prognosis, both patients with right- and left-sided tumours showed significant benefit from maintenance treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:
CAP-B maintenance treatment after six cycles CAPOX-B is effective in first-line treatment of mCRC across all mutational subgroups. The benefit of maintenance treatment was most pronounced in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type and V600EBRAF-mutant tumours.
|
|
|
|
|
L’étude CAIRO-3 a démontré la supériorité d’un traitement d’entretien par capécitabine plus bévacizumab par rapport à la pause complète après un traitement d’induction par capécitabine, oxaliplatine et bévacizumab. Cette nouvelle analyse présente les données actualisées et des sous-groupes en fonction de la localisation de la tumeur primitive et du statut mutationnel (RAS, BRAF et MSI).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cette analyse confirme l’intérêt d’un traitement d’entretien par capécitabine plus bévacizumab par rapport à la pause complète quelque soit la localisation de la tumeur primitive et le statut mutationnel. Ce bénéfice semble plus important dans le groupe de tumeur BRAF muté.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ces données confirment l’intérêt d’un traitement d’entretien, la pause thérapeutique n’étant proposée qu’à des patients sélectionnés (réponse partielle, normalisation de l’ACE…). Cette étude suggère qu’une pause thérapeutique n’est pas opportune en cas de tumeur BRAF mutée compte tenu de l’agressivité de ces tumeurs.
|
|
|