SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Immédiatement
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Sylvain MANFREDI
Coup de coeur :
 
 
British journal of Cancer
  2017/06  
 
  2017 Jun ;116(12):1513-1519.  
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.99.  
 
  A meta-analysis comparing the risk of metastases in patients with rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) vs mrEMVI-negative cases  
 
  Siddiqui MRS, Simillis C, Hunter C, Chand M, Bhoday J, Garant A, Vuong T, Artho G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Abulafi AÂ, Brown G  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449006  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Pathological extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer, but can also be identified on MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI). We perform a meta-analysis to determine the risk of metastatic disease at presentation and after surgery in mrEMVI-positive patients compared with negative tumours.

METHODS:

Electronic databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2016. Conventional meta-analytical techniques were used to provide a summative outcome. Quality assessment of the studies was performed.

RESULTS:

Six articles reported on mrEMVI in 1262 patients. There were 403 patients in the mrEMVI-positive group and 859 patients in the mrEMVI-negative group. The combined prevalence of mrEMVI-positive tumours was 0.346(range=0.198-0.574). Patients with mrEMVI-positive tumours presented more frequently with metastases compared to mrEMVI-negative tumours (fixed effects model: odds ratio (OR)=5.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.75, 8.61), z=8.21, df=2, P<0.001). Patients who were mrEMVI-positive developed metastases more frequently during follow-up (random effects model: OR=3.91, 95% CI (2.61, 5.86), z=6.63, df=5, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is prevalent in one-third of patients with rectal cancer. MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion is a poor prognostic factor as evidenced by the five-fold increased rate of synchronous metastases, and almost four-fold ongoing risk of developing metastases in follow-up after surgery.

 
 
Question posée
 
L’invasion vasculaire péri-tumorale objectivée en IRM est-elle prédictive de la présence ou de l’apparition de métastases ?
 
Question posée
 
Risque multiplié par 5 de métastases synchrones, par 4 de métastases métachrones.
 
Commentaires

Méta analyse sur plus de 1200 patients. Analyse non faite en routine par les radiologues : à réclamer probablement. 

 
www.snfge.org