SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
- Pancréas/Voies biliaires
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Edouard Chabrun
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  2015/11  
 
  2015 Nov;82(5):822-7  
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.02.035  
 
  Metal versus plastic for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: clinical outcomes and success  
 
  Sharaiha RZ, DeFilippis EM, Kedia P, Gaidhane M, Boumitri C, Lim HW, Han E, Singh H, Ghumman SS, Kowalski T, Loren D, Kahaleh M, Siddiqui A  
  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25936453  
 
 

BACKGROUND:
Endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) by using double-pigtail (DP) plastic stents requires placement of multiple stents and can be restricted by inadequate drainage and leakage risk. Recently, the use of fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) has been reported as an alternative to DP plastic stents.

OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the clinical outcomes, success rate, and adverse events of EUS-guided drainage of PPs with DP plastic stents and FCSEMSs.

DESIGN:
Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:
Two tertiary-care academic medical centers.

PATIENTS:
This study involved 230 patients (mean age, 52.6 years) with PPs who underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage including 118 that were drained by using DP plastic stents and 112 by using FCSEMSs. A transgastric approach was used in 210 patients (91%), and transduodenal drainage was performed in 20 patients (9%).

INTERVENTIONS:
Stent deployment under EUS guidance.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:
Technical success, early adverse events, stent occlusion requiring reintervention, and long-term success.

RESULTS:
At 12-month follow-up after the initial procedure, complete resolution of PPs by using DP plastic stents was lower compared with those that underwent drainage with FCSEMSs (89% vs 98%; P = .01). Procedural adverse events were noted in 31% in the DP plastic stent group and 16% in the FCSEMS group (P = .006). On multivariable analysis, patients with plastic stents were 2.9 times more likely to experience adverse events (odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.3).

LIMITATIONS:
Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION:
In patients with PPs, EUS-guided drainage by using FCSEMSs improves clinical outcomes and lowers adverse event rates compared with those drained with DP plastic stents.

 
Question posée
 
Le drainage endoscopique des pseudo-kystes pancréatiques doit-il se faire par prothèse plastique ou métallique ?
 
Question posée
 
Étude rétrospective de 230 patients. Après un suivi de 12 mois : meilleur efficacité (98% versus 89%) surtout une meilleure tolérance (16% d’effets secondaires versus 31%) des prothèses métalliques.
 
Commentaires

Une étude très intéressante mais qui mériterait d’être étayée par une étude prospective. C’est un sujet qui pose beaucoup de question aux endoscopistes thérapeutiques au quotidien.

 
www.snfge.org