SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Foie
- Carcinome hépatocellulaire (CHC)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Jean-Louis PAYEN
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of Hepatology
  2017/06  
 
  2017 Jun;66(6):1166-1172  
  doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.012.  
 
  Objective response by mRECIST as a predictor and potential surrogate end-point of overall survival in advanced HCC  
 
  Lencioni R, Montal R, Torres F, Park JW, Decaens T, Raoul JL, Kudo M, Chang C, Ríos J, Boige V, Assenat E, Kang YK, Lim HY, Walters I, Llovet JM  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28131794  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

The Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was developed to overcome the limitations of standard RECIST criteria in response assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate whether objective response by mRECIST accurately predicted overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced HCC treated with systemic targeted therapies and also to preliminarily assess this end-point as a potential surrogate of OS.

METHODS:

Individual patient data from the BRISK-PS randomized phase III trial comparing brivanib vs. placebo (the first to prospectively incorporate mRECIST) were used to analyze objective response as a predictor of OS in a time-dependent covariate analysis. Patients with available imaging scans during follow-up were included (n=334; 85% of those randomized). Moreover, a correlation of the survival probability in deciles vs. the observed objective response was performed to evaluate its suitability as a surrogate end-point.

RESULTS:

Objective response was observed in 11.5% and 1.9% of patients treated with brivanib and placebo respectively, and was associated with a better survival (median OS 15.0 vs. 9.4months, p<0.001). In addition, objective response had an independent prognostic value (HR=0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.91, p=0.025) along with known prognostic factors. Finally, objective response showed promising results as a surrogate of OS in this trial (R=-0.92; 95% CI, -1 to -0.73, p<0.001). It was an early indicator of the treatment effect (median time to objective response was 1.4months).

CONCLUSIONS:

Objective response by mRECIST in advanced HCC predicts OS and thus can be considered as a candidate surrogate end-point. Further studies are needed to support this finding.

LAY SUMMARY:

There is a need to identify surrogate end-points for overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We studied patients from the phase III BRISK trial, comparing brivanib treatment with placebo after sorafenib progression. We demonstrate that objective response is an independent predictor of survival and qualifies as a potential surrogate end-point for overall survival in this patient population.

 

 
Question posée
 
La réponse objective au brivanid: est-il un bon indicateur et pourrait-il se substituer à l’indicateur classique de la survie globale chez les patients présentant un carcinome hépato-cellulaire avancé?
 
Question posée
 
En effet, en comparant le traitement par brivanib contre un placebo chez les patients atteints de carcinome hépatocellulaire progressant sous sorafenib. Cette équipe démontre que la réponse objective est un indicateur d’efficacité indépendant de la survie.
 
Commentaires

Cela me parait bien, bien compliqué …

 
www.snfge.org