SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Docteur Florian ROSTAIN
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gastroenterology
  2017/04  
 
  2017 Apr;152(5):993-1001.e1  
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.008.  
 
  Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Confirmed Persistent Low-Grade Dysplasia Are at Increased Risk for Progression to Neoplasia.  
 
  Duits LC, van der Wel MJ, Cotton CC, Phoa KN, Ten Kate FJ, Seldenrijk CA, Offerhaus GJ, Visser M, Meijer SL, Mallant-Hent RC, Krishnadath KK, Pouw RE, Tijssen JG, Shaheen NJ, Bergman JJ  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/articles/28012849/  
 
 

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For patients with Barrett's esophagus, the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is subjective, and reported outcomes vary. We analyzed data from a multicenter study of endoscopic therapy to identify factors associated with progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with LGD of the esophagus.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 255 patients with a primary diagnosis of LGD (78% men; mean age, 63 years) who participated in a randomized controlled trial of surveillance vs radiofrequency ablation in Europe. Three expert pathologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequent LGD specimens. The presence and degree of dysplasia was separately recorded for each biopsy and classified according to the Vienna Classification system. The primary end point was development of HGD or EAC. We performed univariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association between outcomes and factors such as number of pathologists confirming LGD, multifocality of LGD, and persistence of LGD over time.

RESULTS: Of the 255 patients, 45 (18%) developed HGD or EAC during a median 42-month follow-up period (interquartile range, 25-61 months); patients were examined by a median 4 endoscopies (interquartile range, 3-6 endoscopies). The number of pathologists confirming LGD was strongly associated with progression to neoplasia; risk for progression increased greatly when all 3 pathologists agreed on LGD (odds ratio, 47.14; 95% confidence interval, 13.10-169.70). When LGD was detected at baseline and confirmed by a subsequent endoscopy, the odds for progression to neoplasia also increased greatly (odds ratio, 9.28; 95% confidence interval, 4.39-19.64). Multifocal LGD was not significantly associated with progression to neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS: The number of pathologists confirming LGD and persistence of LGD over time increase risk for development of HGD or EAC in patients with Barrett's esophagus and LGD. These simple, readily available variables can help stratify risk and select patients for prophylactic ablation therapy.

 
Question posée
 
Quel est le risque évolutif de la dysplasie de bas grade DBG de l’œsophage de Barrett ?
 
Question posée
 
Etude rétrospective sur 255 patients ayant de la DBG qui participaient à une étude européenne randomisée contrôlée comparant radiofréquence versus surveillance. Quarante-cinq patients (18%) ont développé de la dysplasie de haut grade ou un adénocarcinome sur une durée médiane de 42 mois. Le nombre de pathologistes confirmant la DBG, ainsi que la confirmation de la DBG lors d’une endoscopie ultérieure étaient associé à une augmentation du risque néoplasique.
 
Commentaires

Le diagnostic histologique de DBG au sein d’une muqueuse de Barrett est difficile. Toutefois, une fois un diagnostic robuste posé, le risque évolutif est important et peut faire reconsidérer une simple surveillance vis-à-vis d’un geste d’ablation ou de résection. Des solutions restent à trouver pour améliorer le diagnostic.

 
www.snfge.org