|
|
|
Thématique :
- Cancers autres
|
|
|
Originalité :
Très original
|
|
|
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique : |
Pas encore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Sylvain MANFREDI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
British journal of Cancer
|
 |
|
2017/10
|
|
|
|
2017 Oct ;117(9):1286-1294.
|
|
|
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.294.
|
|
|
|
Preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab in rectal cancer: significance of pre-treatment and post-resection RAS mutations Open
|
|
|
|
Gollins S, West N, Sebag-Montefiore D, Myint AS, Saunders M, Susnerwala S, Quirke P, Essapen S, Samuel L, Sizer B, Worlding J, Southward K, Hemmings G, Tinkler-Hundal E, Taylor M, Bottomley D, Chambers P, Lawrie E, Lopes A, Beare S
|
|
|
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28859058
|
|
|
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The influence of EGFR pathway mutations on cetuximab-containing rectal cancer preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is uncertain.
METHODS:
In a prospective phase II trial (EXCITE), patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined non-metastatic rectal adenocarinoma threatening/involving the surgical resection plane received pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine, irinotecan and cetuximab. Resection was recommended 8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was histopathologically clear (R0) resection margin. Pre-planned retrospective DNA pyrosequencing (PS) and next generation sequencing (NGS) of KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and BRAF was performed on the pre-treatment biopsy and resected specimen.
RESULTS:
Eighty-two patients were recruited and 76 underwent surgery, with R0 resection in 67 (82%, 90%CI: 73-88%) (four patients with clinical complete response declined surgery). Twenty-four patients (30%) had an excellent clinical or pathological response (ECPR). Using NGS 24 (46%) of 52 matched biopsies/resections were discrepant: ten patients (19%) gained 13 new resection mutations compared to biopsy (12 KRAS, one PIK3CA) and 18 (35%) lost 22 mutations (15 KRAS, 7 PIK3CA). Tumours only ever testing RAS wild-type had significantly greater ECPR than tumours with either biopsy or resection RAS mutations (14/29 [48%] vs 10/51 [20%], P=0.008), with a trend towards increased overall survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P=0.055).
CONCLUSIONS:
This regimen was feasible and the primary study endpoint was met. For the first time using pre-operative rectal CRT, emergence of clinically important new resection mutations is described, likely reflecting intratumoural heterogeneity manifesting either as treatment-driven selective clonal expansion or a geographical biopsy sampling miss.
|
|
|
|
|
Efficacité d'un nouveau schéma de radiochimiothérapie préopératoire du cancer du rectum associant 5FU-IRINOTECAN-CETUXIMAB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schéma faisable avec un taux de résection RO de 82%.
Sélection de clones tumoraux RAS mutés.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A confirmer par phase 3.
|
|
|