SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Astrid LIÈVRE
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of clinical oncology (JCO)
  2016/08  
 
  2016 Aug 10;34(23):2728-35  
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.1901  
 
  Regorafenib for the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer (INTEGRATE): A Multinational Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial  
 
  Pavlakis N, Sjoquist KM, Martin AJ, Tsobanis E, Yip S, Kang YK, Bang YJ, Alcindor T, O'Callaghan CJ, Burnell MJ, Tebbutt NC, Rha SY, Lee J, Cho JY, Lipton LR, Wong M, Strickland A, Kim JW, Zalcberg JR, Simes J, Goldstein D  
  http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/early/2016/06/15/JCO.2015.65.1901.abstract  
 
 

Purpose
We evaluated the activity of regorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Patients and Methods
We conducted an international (Australia and New Zealand, South Korea, and Canada) randomized phase II trial in which patients were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio and stratified by lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease (one v two) and region. Eligible patients received best supportive care plus regorafenib 160 mg or matching placebo orally on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or prohibitive adverse events occurred. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Final analysis included data to December 31, 2014.

Results
A total of 152 patients were randomly assigned from November 7, 2012, to February 25, 2014, yielding 147 evaluable patients (regorafenib, n = 97; placebo, n = 50). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Median PFS significantly differed between groups (regorafenib, 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.1 and placebo, 0.9 months; 95% CI, 0.9 to 0.9; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.59; P < .001). The effect was greater in South Korea than in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada combined (HR, 0.12 v 0.61; interaction P < .001) but consistent across age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, primary site, lines of chemotherapy, peritoneal metastasis presence, number of metastatic sites, and plasma vascular endothelial growth factor A. A survival trend in favor of regorafenib was seen (median, 5.8 months; 95% CI, 4.4 to 6.8 v 4.5 months; 95% CI, 3.4 to 5.2; HR, 0.74; P = .147). Twenty-nine patients assigned to placebo received open-label regorafenib after disease progression. Regorafenib toxicity was similar to that previously reported.

Conclusion
In this phase II trial, regorafenib was effective in prolonging PFS in refractory advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Regional differences were found, but regorafenib was effective in both regional groups. A phase III trial is planned.

 
Question posée
 
Phase II randomisée comparant le regorafenib à un placebo dans le traitement de 2ème ligne et plus des adénocarcinomes œso-gastriques avancés.
 
Question posée
 
Cette étude est clairement positive avec une amélioration significative de la SSP médiane et une tendance à l’amélioration de la survie globale, toutefois non significative, mais 60% des malades du bras placebo avaient eu un cross over. Le profil de tolérance restait correct avec essentiellement une HTA et une cytolyse majorées dans le bras Regorafenib.
 
Commentaires

Cette étude confirme l’intérêt d’une thérapie antiangiogénique en 2ème ou 3ème ligne de traitement des cancers gastriques avancés. Ces résultats restent à confirmer en phase III en intégrant les nouveaux standards dans cette situation (irinotecan, taxanes).

 
www.snfge.org