SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Endoscopie/Imagerie
- MICI
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Emmanuel CORON
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gut
  2016/07  
 
  2016;65:1119-1125  
  doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308973  
 
  Reliability among central readers in the evaluation of endoscopic findings from patients with Crohn's disease  
 
  Khanna R, Zou G, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P, McDonald JW, Daperno M, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Dubcenco E, Stitt L, Vandervoort MK, Donner A, Luo A, Levesque BG  
  http://gut.bmj.com/content/65/7/1119.abstract?sid=5030a4be-f948-4557-a1f1-d7875151adf1  
 
 

Objective
The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) are commonly used to assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity; however, neither instrument has been fully validated. We assessed intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of these indices.

Design
Video recordings of colonoscopies obtained from 50 patients with CD who participated in an induction trial of a biological therapy were triplicated and reviewed in random order by four central readers. Data were used to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for CDEIS, SES-CD and a global evaluation of lesion severity (GELS). Subsequently, readers participated in a consensus process that identified common sources of disagreement.

Results
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra-rater reliability for CDEIS, SES-CD and GELS (95% CIs) were 0.89 (0.86 to 0.93), 0.91 (0.89 to 0.95) and 0.81 (0.77 to 0.89), respectively, with standard error of measurement (SEM) of 2.10, 2.42 and 1.15. The corresponding ICCs for inter-rater reliability were 0.71 (0.63 to 0.76), 0.83 (0.75 to 0.88) and 0.62 (0.52 to 0.70), with SEM of 3.42, 3.07 and 1.63, respectively. Correlation between CDEIS and GELS was 0.75, between SES-CD and GELS was 0.74 and between CDEIS and SES-CD was 0.92. The most common sources of disagreement were interpretation of superficial ulceration, definition of disease site at the ileocolonic anastomosis, assessment of anorectal lesions and grading severity of stenosis.

Conclusions
Central reading of CDEIS and SES-CD had ‘substantial’ to ‘almost perfect’ intra-rater and inter-rater reliability; however, the responsiveness of these instruments is yet to be determined.

 
Question posée
 
Quelles sont les reproductibilités respectives des scores CDEIS (Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity) et SES-CD (Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease) ?
 
Question posée
 
A partir d’une relecture centralisées de 50 enregistrements vidéos, ce travail suggère une excellente reproductibilité, à la fois inter- et intra-observateurs, de ces 2 scores.
 
Commentaires

Ces scores endoscopiques, sous-utilisés en pratique courante, sont de bons outils d’évaluation et de suivi de la maladie de Crohn, comme cela est démontré par ce travail.

 
www.snfge.org