SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- MICI
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Vered ABITBOL-SELINGER
Coup de coeur :
 
 
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  2017/10  
 
  2017 Oct;112(10):1584-1592.  
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.580.  
 
  Responsiveness of Endoscopic Indices of Disease Activity for Crohn’s Disease  
 
  Khanna R, Zou G, Stitt L, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, McDonald JWD, Dubcenco E, Fogel R, Panaccione R, Jairath V, Nelson S, Shackelton LM, Huang B, Zhou Q, Robinson AM, Levesque BG, D'Haens G  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28071654  
 
 

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) are commonly used to assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity; however neither instrument is fully validated. We evaluated the responsiveness to change of the SES-CD and CDEIS using data from a trial of adalimumab, a drug therapy of known efficacy.

METHODS:

Paired video recordings (N=112) of colonoscopies (baseline and week 8-12) obtained from patients with CD who participated in a trial of adalimumab therapy were reviewed in random order, in duplicate, by four central readers (56 pairs of videos by 2 groups of readers). Responsiveness of the SES-CD and the CDEIS was evaluated by comparing correlations between the observed and pre-specified predictions of change scores for these endoscopic indices with a global endoscopic evaluation of severity (GELS), a patient reported outcome (PRO2), and the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), and by calculation of the standardized effect size, and Guyatt's Responsiveness statistic (GRS) using 2 definitions of change; (1) treatment assignment and (2) an absolute change in total PRO2 of 50. The potential application of effect size estimates was demonstrated by calculating hypothetical sample sizes for comparing two independent groups. The impact of removing stenosis as an index item and adjusting for the number of segments observed was also assessed.

RESULTS:

Changes in both endoscopic instruments and the GELS were highly correlated. The SES-CD displayed numerically higher effect sizes for both definitions of change. The standardized effect size and GRS estimates (95% confidence interval) for the SES-CD based on treatment assignment were 0.84 (0.53, 1.15) and 0.79 (0.48, 1.09). Corresponding values for the CDEIS were 0.72 (0.42, 1.02) and 0.75 (0.45, 1.06). The standardized effect size and GRS estimates for the SES-CD based on an absolute change in total PRO2 of 50 points or greater were 0.76 (0.49, 1.02) and 0.93 (0.64, 1.21). Corresponding values for CDEIS were 0.70 (0.44, 0.97), 0.83 (0.55, 1.10). Removal of stenosis as an index item and adjusting for observed segments did not improve responsiveness estimates.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although both the SES-CD and CDEIS are valid measures of endoscopic disease activity that are moderately responsive to changes in endoscopic disease activity, the SES-CD displayed numerically greater responsiveness in this data set.

 
 
Question posée
 
Quelles sont les sensibilités au changement des scores endoscopiques SES-CD et CDEIS évaluées sur des coloscopies faites dans le cadre d’un essai thérapeutique de l’adalimumab dans la maladie de Crohn (Essai EXTEND) ?
 
Question posée
 
• Les deux scores sont modérément sensibles aux changements d’activité endoscopique • Dans cette analyse de données, le score SES-CD montrait une plus grande réactivité numérique au changement • L'élimination de l’item « sténose » et l'ajustement pour les segments observés n’amélioraient pas la sensibilité des scores
 
Commentaires

A lire sur le même thème dans le même numéro du journal l’Editorial par Anna M. Buchner et Gary R. Lichtenstein. 

 
www.snfge.org