SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancer colorectal (CCR)
Originalité :
Réexamen
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Sylvain MANFREDI
 
 
Digestive and Liver Disease
  2016/06  
 
  2017 Jan;49(1):34-37  
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.025  
 
  Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps  
 
  Ponugoti PL, Cummings OW, Rex DK  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443490  
 
 

Abstract

The prevalence of cancer in small and diminutive polyps is relevant to "resect and discard" and CT colonography reporting recommendations. We evaluated a prospectively collected colonoscopy polyp database to identify polyps <10mm and those with cancer or advanced histology (high-grade dysplasia or villous elements). Of 32,790 colonoscopies, 15,558 colonoscopies detected 42,630 polyps <10mm in size. A total of 4790 lesions were excluded as they were not conventional adenomas or serrated class lesions. There were 23,524 conventional adenomas <10mm of which 22,952 were tubular adenomas. There were 14,316 serrated class lesions of which 13,589 were hyperplastic polyps and the remainder were sessile serrated polyps. Of all conventional adenomas, 96 had high-grade dysplasia including 0.3% of adenomas ≤5mm in size and 0.8% of adenomas 6-9mm in size. Of all conventional adenomas, 2.1% of those ≤5mm in size and 5.6% of those 6-9mm in size were advanced. Among 36,107 polyps ≤5mm in size and 6523 polyps 6-9mm in size, there were no cancers. These results support the safety of resect and discard as well as current CT colonography reporting recommendations for small and diminutive polyps.

 

 

 
Question posée
 
Peut-on « négliger » les polypes de moins de 10mm, notamment ceux vus en coloscanner ?
 
Question posée
 
Aucun cancer diagnostiqué sur près de 43000 polypes de moins de 10mm.
 
Commentaires

Etude de cohorte. Exclusion des adénomes non conventionnels et des lésions festonnées ! Près de 5000 cas …potentiellement les plus à risque…

 
www.snfge.org