SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
Originalité :
Intermédiaire
Solidité :
Intermédiaire
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Thomas APARICIO
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Gut
  2018/06  
 
  2018 Jun. pii: gutjnl-2017-314498.  
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314498.  
 
  Surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions: a multicentre prospective cohort study from low incidence regions.  
 
  den Hollander WJ, Holster IL, den Hoed CM, Capelle LG, Tang TJ, Anten MP, Prytz-Berset I, Witteman EM, Ter Borg F, Hartog GD, Bruno MJ, Peppelenbosch MP, Lesterhuis W, Doukas M, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW.  
  https://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2018/06/06/gutjnl-2017-314498  
 
 

Abstract

Objective International guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions. However, the diagnostic yield and preventive effect require further study. We therefore aimed to assess the incidence of neoplastic progression and to assess the ability of various tests to identify patients most at risk for progression.

Design Patients from the Netherlands and Norway with a previous diagnosis of atrophic gastritis (AG), intestinal metaplasia (IM) or dysplasia were offered endoscopic surveillance. All histological specimens were assessed according to the updated Sydney classification and the operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM) system. In addition, we measured serum pepsinogens (PG) and gastrin-17.

Results 279 (mean age 57.9 years, SD 11.4, male/female 137/142) patients were included and underwent at least one surveillance endoscopy during follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 57 months (SD 36). Four subjects (1.4%) were diagnosed with high-grade adenoma/dysplasia or invasive neoplasia (ie, gastric cancer) during follow-up. Two of these patients were successfully treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection, while the other two underwent a total gastrectomy. Compared with patients with extended AG/IM (PGI/II≤3 and/or OGLIM stage III–IV), patients with limited AG/IM (PG I/II>3 and OLGIM stage 0–II) did not develop high-grade adenoma/dysplasia or invasive neoplasia during follow-up (p=0.02).

Conclusion In a low gastric cancer incidence area, a surveillance programme can detect gastric cancer at an early curable stage with an overall risk of neoplastic progression of 0.3% per year. Use of serological markers in endoscopic surveillance programmes may improve risk stratification.

 
Question posée
 
Quels patients doivent être surveillés après diagnostic d’une gastrite atrophique ?
 
Question posée
 
Les patients avec métaplasie intestinale, OLGIM stade III-IV et pepsinogène I/II≤3 ont plus de risque de développer un adénome de haut grade ou un cancer invasif.
 
Commentaires

Les modalités définitives de surveillance endoscopiques après diagnostic d’une gastrite atrophique restent à déterminer.

 
www.snfge.org