SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Pancréas/Voies biliaires
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
A confirmer
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Vinciane REBOURS
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  2017/07  
 
  2017 Jul;15(7):1079-1086.e4.  
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.09.147.  
 
  Tetrahydrocannabinol Does Not Reduce Pain in Patients With Chronic Abdominal Pain in a Phase 2 Placebo-controlled Study.  
 
  de Vries M, van Rijckevorsel DCM, Vissers KCP, Wilder-Smith OHG, van Goor H; Pain and Nociception Neuroscience Research Group.  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27720917  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS:

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most abundant cannabinoid from the plant Cannabis sativa. There is only equivocal evidence that THC has analgesic effects. We performed a phase 2 controlled trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of an oral tablet containing purified THC in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

METHODS:

Sixty-five patients with chronic abdominal pain for 3 months or more (numeric rating scale scores of 3 or more) after surgery or because of chronic pancreatitis were randomly assigned to groups given the THC tablet or identical matching placebos for 50-52 days. Subjects in the THC group were given the tablet first in a step-up phase (3 mg 3 times daily for 5 days and then 5 mg 3 times daily for 5 days), followed by a stable dose phase (8 mg 3 times daily until days 50-52). Preceding and during the entire study period, patients were asked to continue taking their medications (including analgesics) according to prescription. Patients reported any additional pain medications in a diary. Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted preceding medication intake (day 1), after 15 days, and at 50-52 days. Plasma samples were collected on study days 1, 15, and 50-52; mean plasma concentration curves of THC and 11-OH-THC were plotted. The primary end point was pain relief, which was measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) of the mean pain (VAS mean scores) on the basis of information from patient diaries. Secondary end points included pain and quality of life (determined from patient questionnaires), pharmacokinetics, and safety.

RESULTS:

At days 50-52, VAS mean scores did not differ significantly between the THC and placebo groups (F1,46 = 0.016; P = .901). Between the start and end of the study, VAS mean scores decreased by 1.6 points (40%) in the THC group compared with 1.9 points (37%) in the placebo group. No differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Oral THC was generally well-absorbed. Seven patients in the THC group stopped taking the tablets because of adverse events, compared with 2 patients in the placebo group. All (possibly) related adverse events were mild or moderate.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a phase 2 study, we found no difference between a THC tablet and a placebo tablet in reducing pain measures in patients with chronic abdominal pain. THC, administered 3 times daily, was safe and well-tolerated during a 50-day to 52-day treatment period. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01562483 and NCT01551511.

 

 
Question posée
 
Le Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) est-il efficace à visée antalgique pour des douleurs chroniques abdominales dans le cadre de douleur post-opératoire (DPO) ou de pancréatite chronique (PC) ?
 
Question posée
 
Essai de phase 2, randomisé, en double aveugle versus placebo. Population : 21 patients dans le bras THC (8 CP et 13 DPO) et 29 patients dans le bras placebo (15 CP/14 DPO) Le traitement était introduit à dose progressive pour un total de 52 jours de traitement. L’évaluation était faite selon l’évolution des scores de l’échelle visuelle analogique. Un journal était rempli quotidiennement par les patients (EVA, Prise associée d’antalgiques). Au final il n’y avait pas de différence significative entre les 2 groupes au terme du protocole quant à l’évolution de l’EVA, c’est-à-dire de la douleur ressentie.
 
Commentaires

Il est difficile d’obtenir des données pertinentes et scientifiquement fiables quand il s’agit d’évaluer l’efficacité d’un traitement antalgique. Dans ce travail, les auteurs ont regroupé 2 essais initialement prévus (un pour les PC et un pour les DPO) par défaut de recrutement. Les populations et les types de douleurs sont très différentes entre ces 2 groupes, il est donc difficile de tirer des conclusions fiables. De plus les effectifs étaient de petite taille et non apparentés sur le tabac, le sexe, la consommation d’alcool….

 
www.snfge.org