SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancer colorectal (CCR)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
A confirmer
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Pas encore
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Professeur Sylvain MANFREDI
Coup de coeur :
 
 
British journal of Cancer
  2017/05  
 
  2017 May 23;116(11):1408-1414  
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.117  
 
  Text-message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening (TRICCS): a randomised controlled trial  
 
  Hirst Y, Skrobanski H, Kerrison RS, Kobayashi LC, Counsell N, Djedovic N, Ruwende J, Stewart M, von Wagner C  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28441381  
 
 

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

We investigated the effectiveness of a text-message reminder to improve uptake of the English Bowel Cancer Screening programme in London.

METHODS:

We performed a randomised controlled trial across 141 general practices in London. Eight thousand two hundred sixty-nine screening-eligible adults (aged 60-74 years) were randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive either a text-message reminder (n=4134) or no text-message reminder (n=4135) if they had not returned their faecal occult blood test kit within 8 weeks of initial invitation. The primary outcome was the proportion of adults returning a test kit at the end of an 18-week screening episode (intention-to-treat analysis). A subgroup analysis was conducted for individuals receiving an invitation for the first time.

RESULTS:

Uptake was 39.9% in the control group and 40.5% in the intervention group. Uptake did not differ significantly between groups for the whole study population of older adults (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.12; P=0.56) but did vary between the groups for first-time invitees (uptake was 34.9% in the control and 40.5% in the intervention; adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.58; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although text-message reminders did not significantly increase uptake of the overall population, the improvement among first-time invitees is encouraging.

 

 
Question posée
 
Etude de la modalité de relance à 2 mois après non participation au dépistage après l’invitation initiale : relance avec texte vs relance sans texte.
 
Question posée
 
Pas de différence de participation entre ces 2 modalités. Petit effet bénéfique uniquement pour les primo-participants.
 
Commentaires

-

 
www.snfge.org