SNFGE SNFGE
 
Thématique :
- Cancers autres (hors CCR et CHC)
Originalité :
Très original
Solidité :
Très solide
Doit faire évoluer notre pratique :
Dans certains cas
 
 
Nom du veilleur :
Dr Yann TOUCHEFEU
Coup de coeur :
 
 
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
  2018/05  
 
  2018 May 20;36(15):1469-1477.  
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.0355  
 
  Three Versus 6 Months of Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: Disease-Free Survival Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) France, Phase III Trial.  
 
  André T, Vernerey D, Mineur L, Bennouna J, Desrame J, Faroux R, Fratte S, Hug de Larauze M, Paget-Bailly S, Chibaudel B, Bez J, Dauba J, Louvet C, Lepere C, Dupuis O, Becouarn Y, Mabro M, Egreteau J, Bouche O, Deplanque G, Ychou M, Galais MP, Ghiringhelli F, Dourthe LM, Bachet JB, Khalil A, Bonnetain F, de Gramont A, Taieb J; for PRODIGE investigators, GERCOR, Fédération Française de Cancérologie Digestive, and UNICANCER  
  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29620995  
 
 

Abstract

Purpose Reduction of adjuvant treatment duration may decrease toxicities without loss of efficacy in stage III colon cancer. This could offer clear advantages to patients and health care providers.

Methods In International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) France, as part of the IDEA international collaboration, patient with colon cancer patients were randomly assigned to 3 and 6 months of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6: infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) by physician choice. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), and analyses were descriptive.

Results A total of 2,010 eligible patients received either 3 or 6 months of chemotherapy (modified intention-to-treat population); 2,000 (99%) had stage III colon cancer (N1: 75%, N2: 25%); 1,809 (90%) received mFOLFOX6, and 201 (10%) received CAPOX. The median age was 64 years, and the median follow-up time was 4.3 years. Overall, 94% (3 months) and 78% (6 months) of patients completed treatment (fluoropyrimidines ± oxaliplatin). Maximal grade 2 and 3 neuropathy rates were 28% and 8% in the 3-month arm and 41% and 25% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). Final rates of residual neuropathy greater than grade 1 were 3% in the 3-month arm and 7% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). There were 578 DFS events: 314 and 264 in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P = .0112). In the 3 and 6-month arms, respectively, for patients who received mFOLFOX6, the 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51); for the T4 and/or N2 population, they were 58% and 66% (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.82); and for the T1-3N1 population, they were 81% and 83% (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.49).

Conclusion IDEA France, in which 90% of patients received mFOLFOX6, shows superiority of 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 3 months, especially in the T4 and/or N2 subgroups. These results should be considered alongside the international IDEA collaboration data.

 

 
Question posée
 
L’efficacité d’une durée de chimiothérapie adjuvante des cancers coliques de 3 mois est-elle non inférieure à une durée de 6 mois (objectif principal = survie sans maladie à 3 ans) ? Dans l’étude IDEA France, la population de l’étude était insuffisante pour une étude de non-infériorité, l’objectif de cette analyse était de démontrer une supériorité. Seuls des cancers stade III étaient inclus.
 
Question posée
 
Il y avait une supériorité du traitement de 6 mois. Il y avait moins de neurotoxicité grade 2 et 3 dans le traitement de 3 mois. Quatre-vingt-dix pourcents des patients ont reçu du FOLFOX. En analyse de sous-groupe, l’avantage du groupe FOLFOX 6 mois par rapport au groupe FOLFOX 3 mois était significatif pour les T4 et/ou N2, sans différence significative pour les T3-N1.
 
Commentaires

Un traitement par FOLFOX 6 mois reste une référence, et est particulièrement justifié pour les cancers T4 et/ou N2. Ces résultats doivent être interprétés dans le cadre de l’analyse globale de l’étude IDEA.

 
www.snfge.org